In a recent case before a court in Arizona, the defendant appealed convictions for burglary, kidnapping, and intimidating. He was originally charged after an incident in which he trapped his ex-girlfriend in his home and attempted to keep her there against her will. A jury found the defendant guilty, and despite his subsequent appeal, the higher court affirmed the original verdict.
Facts of the Case
According to the opinion, the defendant and his girlfriend broke up in the spring of 2019. Two months after their breakup, the defendant broke into his ex-girlfriend’s home one evening when she was sleeping, turning on her bedroom light and standing over her in an intimidating way. He told his ex-girlfriend that he had a knife, and that if she did not come with him, he would arrange for her family to be killed.
The pair drove to the defendant’s home, where he grabbed his ex-girlfriend and threw her on his bed. She was eventually able to escape and call for help. She also got the police involved, and they arrested the defendant and charged him with the following offenses: attempt to commit sexual assault, burglary in the second degree, kidnapping, and threatening or intimidating. A jury eventually found the defendant guilty of all charges except for attempt to commit sexual assault. He was sentenced to 23 years in prison.
The defendant appealed his convictions, asking the higher court to conduct a thorough review of the trial court’s record in order to make sure there were no errors in the proceedings below. Interestingly, the defendant had an opportunity to write a supplemental brief about why his convictions should be reversed, but the court noted that the defendant failed to take advantage of this opportunity.
Reviewing the record, the higher court ultimately determined that the trial court’s proceedings were conducted in accordance with Arizona rules of criminal procedure. He had counsel during the trial, he was given the opportunity to speak during the proceedings, and the prosecution submitted enough evidence for the jury to reasonably determine the defendant was guilty.
Having conducted this review, and without additional argument from the defendant, the court affirmed the guilty convictions. The decision might have been different if the defendant had sought additional legal advice and advanced specific arguments regarding the trial court’s errors, but without this supplemental brief from the defendant, the higher court was not inclined to rule in his favor.
Are You Looking for an Aggressive Defense Attorney in the State of Arizona?
At the Law Office of James E. Novak, we understand that when facing criminal charges, you only want the best and most aggressive representation on your side. With almost two decades of experience in litigating criminal cases, we pride ourselves in offering high-quality legal services that put your needs first. For a free and confidential consultation, call us today at 480-413-1499. You can also fill out our online form to have an attorney reach back out to you as soon as possible about your case.